Sports News
| College Football | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | | | Scoreboard | | | Standings | | | Teams | | | Leaders | | | Polls | | | Odds | ||||
| Sat. 9/5 | Sat. 9/12 | Sat. 9/19 | Sat. 9/26 | Sat. 10/3 |
| @ Fla TBA |
vs. WestIl TBA |
vs. NoAri TBA |
@ SoUt TBA |
vs. Mont TBA |
The U. in FCS college football | |
(Stats Perform) - Sports Illustrated recently published a story that analyzed data from the 2010s to identify which FBS programs can brand themselves as the modern "U" at different positions. We've crunched a decade's worth of numbers with FCS programs and found similar results. FCS dynasty North Dakota State is the U. at three of eight positions with five other schools earning one distinction each. That's what SI found with FBS power Alabama being the U. at three positions and five other schools claiming one position title each. MORE | |
| Leaders | |||||
| Passing Yards: | E. Barriere | 3712 | |||
| Passing TDs: | E. Barriere | 31 | |||
| Rushing Yards: | A. Custer Jr. | 1228 | |||
| Rushing TDs: | A. Custer Jr. | 16 | |||
| Receiving Yards: | A. Boston | 730 | |||
| Receiving TDs: | T. Limu-Jones | 7 | |||
| Interceptions: | None | ||||
| Schedule 2020 | ||||
| Date | Opponent | Result / Time | ||
| 9/5 | at Florida | TBA | ||
| 9/12 | vs. Western Illinois | TBA | ||
| 9/19 | vs. Northern Arizona | TBA | ||
| 9/26 | at Southern Utah | TBA | ||
| 10/3 | vs. Montana | TBA | ||
| 10/10 | at Northern Colorado | TBA | ||
| 10/17 | vs. Idaho | TBA | ||
| 10/24 | vs. Weber State | TBA | ||
| 10/31 | at UC Davis | TBA | ||
| 11/7 | vs. Montana State | TBA | ||
| 11/20 | at Portland State | TBA | ||
| Big Sky | ||||||||||||
| Conference | Overall | |||||||||||
| 3 Weber State | 7-1 | 11-4 | ||||||||||
| 9 Sacramento State | 7-1 | 9-4 | ||||||||||
| 4 Montana State | 6-2 | 11-4 | ||||||||||
| 6 Montana | 6-2 | 10-4 | ||||||||||
| Eastern Washington | 6-2 | 7-5 | ||||||||||
| California-Davis | 3-5 | 5-7 | ||||||||||
| Portland State | 3-5 | 5-7 | ||||||||||
| Idaho | 3-5 | 5-7 | ||||||||||
| Cal Poly | 2-6 | 3-8 | ||||||||||
| Southern Utah | 2-6 | 3-9 | ||||||||||
| Northern Arizona | 2-6 | 4-8 | ||||||||||
| Northern Colorado | 2-6 | 2-10 | ||||||||||
| Idaho State | 2-6 | 3-9 | ||||||||||
| Offense (FCS Rank) | |||||
| Yards: | 6298 (6) | ||||
| Passing Yards: | 3805 (7) | ||||
| Rushing Yards: | 2493 (21) | ||||
| Points per game: | 40.6 (2) | ||||
| Yards per game: | 524.8 (1) | ||||
| Touchdowns: | 61 (12) | ||||
| Field Goals: | 13 (33) | ||||
| Defense (FCS Rank) | |||||
| Yards: | 5345 (105) | ||||
| Passing Yards: | 3196 (107) | ||||
| Rushing Yards: | 2149 (85) | ||||
| Points per game: | 34.6 (99) | ||||
| Yards per game: | 445.4 (106) | ||||
| Touchdowns: | 53 (108) | ||||
| Field Goals: | 7 (19) | ||||
© 2020 by STATS PERFORM.Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS PERFORM is strictly prohibited.
